Maximilian Figl vs Alessandro Spadola Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When it comes to serving under pressure, how do Spadola and Figl stack up? In recent months, Spadola’s second serve has won them 46.29% of points, a slight edge over Figl, who has netted 41.24% in the same category. This aspect is often closely tied to match outcomes, hinting at Spadola's potential to perform under pressure.

The return game is another battlefield where these players clash. Spadola has captured 46.72% of their opponent's second serve points, a number overshadowed by Figl’s commanding 52.11%. Yet, when focusing on first serve returns, Spadola pulls ahead with 34.42%, leaving Figl trailing at 26.79%. These figures could make all the difference in a fiercely contested clash.

How do these players save breakpoints when pressed hard? Spadola again exhibits resilience, saving 51.89% of breakpoints compared to Figl’s 46.91%. Such stats can significantly influence in-game predictions and provide bettors with insights into who might hold their nerve on the big points.

Looking at their year-long performances, Spadola has secured a 60% match win rate with a record of 24 wins and 16 losses, while Figl has a slightly lower win rate of 53.33%, standing at 32 wins against 28 losses. Could this suggest an edge for Spadola heading into their encounter?

What about surface preferences? For Spadola, hard courts have been fruitful grounds, boasting a 59% win rate. In contrast, Figl has been more proficient on clay, securing wins in 50% of their matches. However, both players stumble on indoor hard courts, with Spadola at a mere 29% and Figl winless in this environment.

Level of play and quality of opposition also paint a vivid picture. Spadola has been competing mainly in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, winning 61.54% of matches. Figl has participated in similar tiers, claiming victory in 53.33% of encounters. A closer look at their opponents reveals stark differences; Spadola played opponents with an average rank of 226.32, while Figl battled players averaging a rank of 49.28, suggesting varying strengths of competition.

In deciding sets, known for their drama and unpredictability, Spadola shines, having won 58% of such encounters over the last year. Figl, however, has struggled, achieving only a 35% success rate, which could be pivotal if the match reaches its climax.

Recent breakpoint conversion rates further fuel the debate. Spadola’s efficiency stands at 47.62%, marginally better than Figl’s 43.59%. This statistic becomes critical during live matches, where the ability to convert a slim lead could alter the course of the game.

With these insights in hand, the stage seems set in Spadola’s favor. Their overall edge in serving, breakpoint resilience, and ability to close out deciding sets position them as favorites to triumph over Figl. Let's see if these stats truly paint the winning picture on the court!